Hyperphosphorylated neurofilament NF-H as a predictor of mortality after brain injury in children
| Name | Phosphorylated Neurofilament H Human ELISA |
|---|---|
| Cat. No. | RD191138300R RUO |
| Other names | pNF-H |
| Product category | Neural tissue damage markers |
| Assay format | Sandwich ELISA, Biotin-labelled antibody |
| Calibration range | 62.5 - 4000 pg/ml |
| Limit of detection | 23.5 pg/ml |
| Applications | Cerebrospinal fluid, Plasma, Serum, Tissue extract |
| Sample requirements | |
| Storage/Shipping | Store the complete kit at 2 8°C. |
Objective

The aim of the study was to determine whether serum levels of hyperphosphorylated neurofilament NF-H correlate with severity of brain injury in children.
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide, especially in children and young adults. TBI is difficult to assess and clinical examinations are of restricted value during the first hours and days after injury.
Methods
The study protocol and informed consent was approved by Ethics committee of
the University Hospital Brno.
Forty-nine patients with TBI were enrolled into the prospective study. Venous
blood samples were taken after admission and every 24 h for a maximum of
6 consecutive days. Serum pNF-H was measured by sandwich enzyme immunoassay for
the quantitative measurement of human phosphorylated neurofilament H (BioVendor,
Laboratorní medicína a.s., Czech Republic).
Clinical outcome was evaluated 6 months after TBI using Glasgow Outcome Scale
(GOS) in all patients.
Results
GOS was taken as principal end-point for all predictive analyses, i.e.
analyses that have been performed in order to assess the predictive potential of
a set of patient’s and injury characteristics.
Limit of ELISA detection was 12 pg/ml.
Table 1 documents summary statistics of accessible
initial characteristics of injured children. It is apparent that common
descriptors like age, sex and weight are not related to the final GOS values.
Table 1 also indicates statistically significant
relationship between some descriptors and a group of patients with GOS = 1:
- GCS ≤ 8 (all patients with GOS = 1 belong to this category)
- Marshall classification score > II (no patient with GOS=1 has Marshall score I or II)- chart 2
- Increased incidence of some type of injury, as diagnosed using CT examination:
All the parameters which significantly distinguished patients with GOS=1 from the others (Table 1) serve as candidates for effective predictors.
The quantitative level of pNF-H remained significantly higher in the risk group (GOS = 1) in comparison with the other patients for the 2nd – 4nd day (Table 2). Ratio pNF-H in 2nd – 6nd day/initial pNF-H value was statistically significantly differentiated both compared group of patients (with GOS =1 and with GOS > 1) (Table 2– chart 1).
Levels of pNF-H was significantly higher in patients with diffuse axonal
injury on initial CT scan (Table 3– chart 2). Increased pNF-H levels (2nd day of
hospitalization) was found in Marshal classification (Table
4– chart 3).
Single findings and multiple findings are significantly associated with risk
score of GCS and Marshall classification score (Table 5).
Except for this relationship, the GCS score appears to be rather independent on
injury type.
Normal levels pNF-H in the pediatric population is unknown. Objective ROC
analysis was identification of optimal cut-offs of proteins for prediction of
GOS = 1. The initial level of pNF-H reached very low sensitivity and
specificity, in 2nd day cut-off was 117.1 (pg/ml) (Table 6).
Conclusions
Although further, prospective study is warranted, these findings suggest, that levels of hyperphosphorylated neurofilament NF-H correlate with mortality and may be useful as predictors of outcome in children with TBI..
Key Words
children, brain injury, biomarkers, outcome, hyperphosphorylated neurofilament
Table 1: Summary statistics of sample data 1
| Parameters | The whole sample | GOS > 1 | GOS = 1 | p2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | N=49 | N=42 | N=7 | |
| Age (months) | 103 (8 – 204) | 96 (11 – 204) | 134 (8 – 171) | 0.605 |
| Weight (kg) | 36 (4 – 120) | 26 (4 – 90) | 47 (8 – 120) | 0.439 |
| Sex (male) | N=26 | N=23 | N=3 | 0.559 |
| GCS | ||||
| GCS≤8 | 32 | 25 | 7 | |
| GCS=9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |
| GCS≥10 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0.037 |
| Marshal classification | ||||
| I+II | 33 | 33 | 0 | |
| III+IV | 6 | 3 | 3 | |
| V+VI | 10 | 6 | 4 | <0.001 |
| Initial CT diagnostics | ||||
| No findings | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0.159 |
| Single findings | ||||
| Intracranial bleeding | 23 | 17 | 6 | 0.021 |
| Diffuse axonal injury | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0.099 |
| Subdural hematoma | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0.022 |
| Contusion | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0.757 |
| Skull fracture | 20 | 14 | 6 | 0.008 |
| Epidural hematoma | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0.200 |
| Subarachnoidal bleeding | 27 | 21 | 6 | 0.063 |
| Edema | 23 | 16 | 7 | 0.001 |
| Multiple findings | ||||
| Scull fracture + other findings | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0.004 |
| Multiple bleeding findings | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0.031 |
| Other combinations | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0.049 |
| Days in hospital | 6 | 6 | 5 | 0.492 |
1 Categorical variables are summarized as N and percentage of a given category; continuous variables are described by median and by 5th – 95th percentile range (in parentheses)
2 Statistical significance of difference between groups with GOS > 1 and GOS = 1 was analyzed by means of Mann-Whitney U test (continuous variables) and maximum likelihood chi-square (categorical variables)
Table 2. Summary statistics of NF-H values
| Values of NF-H and sample size: | The whole sample | GOS > 1 | GOS = 1 | P 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (patients:with GOS > 1 / with GOS=1) | ||||
| Quantitative values of NF-H in pg/ml 1 | ||||
| Initial value (38 / 7) | 12 (12 – 867) |
12 (12 – 867) |
36.1 (12 – 1 482) |
0.246 |
| 2nd day (37 / 7) | 12 (12 – 2 200) |
12 (12 – 2 200) |
151.9 (12 – 6 765) |
0.027 |
| 3rd day (37 / 6) | 13 (12 – 3 793) |
12 (12 – 2 330) |
221.6 (12 – 6 860) |
0.019 |
| 4th day (34 / 6) | 54.2 (12 – 2 761) |
12 (12 – 979) |
410 (12 – 7 845) |
0.010 |
| 5th day (31 / 5) | 106.7 (12 – 3 484) |
94.5 (12 – 3 484) |
729.8 (12 – 1 067) |
0.091 |
| 6th day (30 / 5) | 228.8 (12 – 3 607) |
203.5 (12 – 3 289) |
855.3 (12 – 3 607) |
0.086 |
1 Quantitative values are summarized by median and by 5th – 95th percentile range
2 Statistical significance of difference between GOS > 1 and GOS = 1 was analyzed by means of Mann-Whitney U test
Chart 1: Quantitative values of NF-H in pg/ml1

Ratio pNF-H in 2nd – 6 nd day/initial pNF-H value was statistically significantly differentiated both compared group of patients (with GOS =1 and with GOS > 1)
Table 3. Initial CT diagnostics in relation to initial values of marker
| CT examination | No of patients N 1 | NF-H initial value (pg/ml) 2 |
| Initial CT diagnostics | ||
| No findings | 6 | 15.5 (12.0 – 90.9) |
| Single findings | ||
| Intracranial bleeding | 23 | 12.0 (12.0 – 727.0) |
| Diffuse axonal injury | 9 | 158.7 (12.0 – 867.0)* |
| Subdural hematoma | 16 | 12.0 (12.0 – 1 482.0) |
| Contusion | 9 | 12.0 (12.0 – 224.0) |
| Skull fracture | 20 | 12.0 (12.0 – 727.0) |
| Epidural hematoma | 6 | 12.0 (12.0 – 36.1) |
| Subarachnoidal bleeding | 27 | 12.0 (12.0 – 1 442.0) |
| Edema | 23 | 12.0 (12.0 – 867.0) |
| Multiple findings | ||
| Scull fracture + other findings | 18 | 12.0 (12.0 – 1 482.0) |
| Multiple bleeding findings | 17 | 12.0 (12.0 – 1 482.0) |
| Other combinations | 11 | 12.0 (12.0 – 1 442.0) |
1 Diagnostic findings within the whole dataset
2 Median and 5th – 95th percentile range
* statistically significant difference between groups of patients with and without given CT finding; analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test
Chart 2: Initial CT diagnostics

Levels of pNF-H was significantly higher in patients with diffuse axonal injury on initial CT scan
Table 4: NF-H values stratified according to diagnostic kriteria
| NF-H initial value (μg/l) 1 | NF-H 2nd day (µg/l) 1 | |
| GCS | ||
| ≤ 8 | 12 (12.00 – 867.00) |
12 (12.00 – 2 413.00) |
| > 8 | 12 (12.00 – 1 442.00) |
12 (12.00 – 2 200.00) |
| p-value2 | 0.559 | 0.301 |
| Marshal classification | ||
| I – II | 12 (12.00 – 867.00) |
12 (12.00 – 519.00) |
| III – VI | 33.49 (12.00 – 1 482.00) |
62.05 (12.00 – 6 765.00) |
| p-value2 | 0,062 | 0,004 |
| Days in hospital | ||
| in hospital ≤ 6 days | 12 (12.00 – 1 442.00) |
12 (12.00 – 2 200.00) |
| in hospital > 6 days | 12 (12.00 – 867.00) |
12 (12.00 – 2 413.00) |
| p-value2 | 0.607 | 0.688 |
1 median and 5th – 95th percentile range
2 statistical significance was analyzed by means of Mann-Whitney U test
Chart 3: NF-H values stratified according to diagnostic criteria

Increased pNF-H levels (2nd day of hospitalization) was found in Marshal classification.
Chart 4: Initial CT diagnostics in relation to GCS and Marshal classification

Table 5: Initial CT diagnostics in relation to GCS and Marshal classification
| CT examination | No of patients | GCS ≤ 8 | Marshall classification III – VI |
| N 1 | N 2 | N 2 | |
| Initial CT diagnostics | |||
| No findings | 6 | 3 | 0 |
| Single findings | |||
| Intracranial bleeding | 23 | 17 | 11 |
| Diffuse axonal injury | 9 | 8 | 3 |
| Subdural hematoma | 16 | 11 | 9 |
| Contusion | 9 | 5 | 3 |
| Skull fracture | 20 | 11 | 11 |
| Epidural hematoma | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Subarachnoidal bleeding | 27 | 18 | 12 |
| Edema | 23 | 17 | 12 |
| Multiple findings | |||
| Scull fracture + other findings | 18 | 9 | 11 |
| Multiple bleeding findings | 17 | 11 | 10 |
| Other combinations | 11 | 10 | 1 |
1 Diagnostic findings within the whole dataset
2 Diagnostic findings in the patients with GCS ≤ 8 or with Marshall classification > II
* statistically significant difference between groups of patients with and without given CT finding; analyzed by ML chi-square
Single findings and multiple findings are significantly associated with risk score of GCS and Marshall classification score.
Table 6: Identification of optimal cut-offs of proteins for prediction of GOS = 1
| Potential predictors | Cut-off (µg/l) |
Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC (95 % CI) 1 |
p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF-H initial | 134.0 | 42.9 | 84.2 | 0.641 (0.398 –0.884) |
0.240 |
| NF-H 2nd day | 117.1 | 71.4 | 83.8 | 0.764 (0.541 – 0.988) |
0.028 |
References
- Kant R, Smith-Seemiller L, Isaac G, Duffy J. Tc-HMPAO SPECT in persistent postconcussion syndrome after mild head injury: comparison with MRI/CT. Brain Inj 1997;11: 115–124.
- Schwartz SM, Duffy JY, Pearl JM, Nelson DP. Cellular and molecular aspects of myocardial dysfunction. Crit Care Med 2001;29:S214–219.
- Haskins WE, Kobeissy FH, Wolper RA, Ottens AK. Rapid discovery of putative protein biomarkers of traumatic brain injury by SDS-PAGE-capillary liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry. J. Neurotrauma 2005;22:629–644
- Ingebrigtsen, T, Romner B. Biochemical serum markers for brain damage: a short review with emphasis on clinical utility in mild head injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2003;21:171–176.
- Denslow N, Michel ME, Temple MD, Hsu CY. Application of proteomics technology to the field of neurotrauma. J. Neurotrauma 2003;20:401–407.
- Žurek J, Bartlova L, Marek L, Fedora M. Serum S100B Protein as a molecular marker of severity in traumatic brain injury in children. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2010;1:37–44
- Shaw G, Yang C, Zhang L, Cook P, Pike BR, Hill WD. Characterization of the bovine neurofilament NF-M protein and cDNA sequence and identification of in vitro and in vivo calpain cleavage sites, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;325:619–625
- Strong MJ, Strong WL, Jaffe H, Traggert B, Souper MM, Pant HC. Phosphorylation state of the native high-molecular-weight neurofilament subunit protein from cervical spinal cord in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, J. Neurochem. 2001;76:1315–1325.
- Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81– 84.
- Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, van Berkum -Clark M, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J.Neurosurg 1991; S14– S20.
- Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;1:480– 484.
- Anderson KJ, Scheff SW, Miller KM, Roberts KN, Gilmer LK, Yang C, Shaw G. The phosphorylated axonal form of the neurofilament subunit NF-H (pNF-H) as a blood biomarker of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2008;1079–85.
- Buki A, Povlishock JT. All roads lead to disconnection?–Traumatic axonal injury revisited. Acta Neurochir.(Wien) 2006;148:181–193.
- Haqqani AS, Hutchison JS, Ward R, Stanimirovic DB. Biomarkers and diagnosis; protein biomarkers in serum of pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury identified by ICAT-LC-MS/MS. J Neurotrauma 2007;1:54–74
- Stephen B Lewis, Regina A Wolper, Lynn Miralia, Cui Yang, Gerry Shaw. Detection of phosphorylated NF-H in the cerebrospinal fluid and blood of aneurysma subarachnoid hemorrhage patiens. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2008;28:1261–1271
- Anderson RE, Hansson LO, Nilsson O, Dijlai-Merzoug R, and Settergren G. High serum S100B levels for trauma patients without head injuries. Neurosurgery 2001;48:1255–1260.
Data sources
The data sources were taken from:
- Zurek J, Bartlová L, Fedora M. Hyperphosphorylated neurofilament NF-H as a predictor of mortality after brain injury in children. Brain Inj. 2011; 25(2): 221–6
| Catalog Number | Species | Analyte | Assay | Regulatory | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RD191138300R | Human | Phosphorylated Neurofilament H | Sandwich ELISA, HRP-labelled antibody | RUO | 96 wells (1 kit) |
